An AI agent that continuously monitors your data for quality failures and surfaces them directly in Slack — with proposed corrections and one-click confirmation, so bad data gets fixed before it reaches a report or a decision.
Catch your first bad numberThe Quality Guardian executes a configurable set of data entry tests against your live data — checking for missing values, out-of-range figures, format violations, referential integrity failures, and custom business rules. Checks run on a schedule you define.
When a check fails, the guardian identifies the responsible data entry test owner and routes the alert directly to them in Slack — either in a shared channel or as a direct message. No support ticket, no email thread. The right person knows immediately.
The agent proposes a corrected field value alongside the alert. The owner can confirm, edit, or dismiss the fix directly from Slack — no system login required. Every action is logged, so there's a full audit trail of what was flagged, proposed, and resolved.
The guardian flags the issue, proposes a fix, and the owner confirms — without leaving Slack.
Missing required field detected
3 records in deals have a null subscription_end_date — expected for all active subscribers.
Proposed correction
End dates pulled from open support tickets for each client — the CS rep confirmed the renewal terms in conversation with the client. Dates extracted from those ticket threads:
Looks right — these were all migrated last week without the renewal date. Confirming.
3 records updated · members.subscription_end_date · logged to audit trail
This is a visualisation of the planned Slack interaction — currently on the roadmap.
Define the rules that matter for your data: required fields, value ranges, format constraints, cross-table consistency checks, and custom business logic. Checks run on a schedule and scale with your data volume.
Failures go directly to the person responsible for that data area — in a shared channel or as a direct message. No manual triage, no group emails. The right person is notified the moment a check fails.
For each failing record, the guardian proposes a corrected value based on surrounding data and business rules. Owners review and confirm — rather than hunting through the source system to figure out what the right value should be.
Every failure, every proposed correction, every confirmation or dismissal is logged. You get a complete record of what was flagged, who resolved it, and when — useful for compliance, data governance reviews, and root cause analysis.
Platforms and operations teams where data quality failures have downstream consequences — inaccurate invoices, wrong reports, broken automations, or compliance exposure. If a bad value in a field can cause a real problem, the Quality Guardian is designed for that context.
Works best when you have defined data entry ownership — specific people responsible for specific data areas — and enough volume of records that manual spot-checking is no longer realistic.
Instead of treating all failing checks equally, the guardian will generate a ranked list of the fields most frequently failing — weighted by failure rate, downstream impact, and how many records are affected. Gives teams a clear place to start when there's more to fix than time allows.
The guardian will propose the specific corrected field value directly in Slack — and let the responsible owner confirm, edit, or dismiss the fix with a single interaction, either in a dedicated channel or a direct message. No system login, no ticket, no back-and-forth.
This is the interaction visualised in the mockup above.
The Quality Guardian pricing model is still being shaped. What we know is that it will involve two components: an initial implementation fee to set up and configure the checks for your data model, and an ongoing licence fee for running and managing the agent.
The licence component is likely to scale with the number of quality checks being actively monitored — so smaller, well-defined setups pay less than broad, multi-table coverage. We'll scope the exact structure together based on your context.
Implementation fee
Setup, configuration, and initial check definitions.
Licence fee
Ongoing managed agent, scaled by number of active quality checks.
Product Owner · Maintainer
Founder · Maxq Analytics
Philip originally built the Quality Guardian — designing the check architecture, the alert routing logic, and the Slack integration. He shaped the add-on around the real data quality challenges faced by B2B SaaS operations teams.
Maintainer & developer
Associate member · Maxq Analytics
Sarah now maintains and develops the Quality Guardian. She manages ongoing improvements, drives the roadmap forward — including the priority failure list and the Slack-native correction workflow — and is the main point of contact for the add-on post-implementation.
Developer
Associate member · Maxq Analytics
Conno contributes to the data engineering work behind the Quality Guardian, supporting the implementation, check configuration, and ongoing maintenance of the add-on across client environments.
We'll map your most critical data entry points, define the first set of quality checks, and set up the guardian — so bad data gets caught before it reaches a report or a decision.
Catch your first bad number